Thursday, December 30, 2010

The Benefits of Self-Publishing (or Why Would I Want To Make More Work For Myself?)

The number one answer is money—to almost any question, probably. With publishing, money has the final vote. How much money a book is likely to make is the biggest factor when publisher’s take on a project. Since the profit margin in traditional publishing is shrinking (as self-publishing is swelling), publishers are more finicky about the manuscripts they consider.  Many publishers are requiring their authors to assist more with marketing. In some cases they require an author to hire a publicist (at the author’s expense, of course) which typically costs between $2,500 and $5,000 per month. So, if you must put out that much money anyway, why not reap more of the benefits?
From figures I have heard and read, traditional publishing pays an author between 1-3% for a new author without a substantial platform (read following or notoriety) and 5-15% for an established author. Self-publishing allows the author to retain all of the profits which can be up to 40% of the wholesale price of a printed book and nearly 100% of e-books (probably more like 75-90% according to my accounting self).
At the conference I recently attended, David Cole spoke about his experience as a small publisher (Bay Tree Publishing). David said he must sell 2000-3000 copies of a book to begin to see profits (without returns from sellers). He gave us a breakdown on the costs associated with printing one of his titles.
Assume he prints 1,000 copies of one title. Typically with a book that retails for $20.00, the wholesale cost is $10.00. After subtracting the contracted distributor fees of 28%, you have $7.20 remaining. A royalty is paid to the author of $0.70, leaving $6.50. Printing and binding cost $2.50, marketing costs $1.00, and editor/design/production/proofreading /cover costs $3.00: this totals $6.50, leaving a zero sum—no margin, no profit. In fact, his overhead (phone, office expenses, mileage, wining & dining) aren't even covered. He said he doesn't add that in since he works from home (not good cost accounting practice!). In this scenario there are two ways to profit: sell more books or increase the selling price. Big publishers must sell tens of thousands of books to break even.
As a close second, the answer is control. The author has complete creative control of content and packaging. No agents or publisher’s editors will require you to change your story or plot in order to get published. Revisions and updates to the book can be made at any time. You can also get your book out quickly, without the 18-24 month delay. The typical self-publishing schedule is 3-6 months.
The number one drawback is also money. The author has to front the money for publishing costs and hiring a publicist is still a good idea.
Marketing remains a high priority either way you publish. New options for self-promotion are being invented every day. Barnes and Noble recently rolled out a tool to assist self-publishers on their website. Review avenues such as Kirkus Reviews and Publisher’s Weekly now offer self-publishers a way to get reviews. This used to be a major selling point for traditional publishers. They could get the work official reviews before publication. Google’s new book site is very self-publisher friendly.
E-books are dramatically changing even self-publishing. More authors are leveraging sites like Amazon to sell their works in an electronic format first. Then, after the title has gained a following, you can print publish. This method allows the author to “try out” a book and see if enough demand can be raised to warrant spending the money on printed books. 15% of books are currently published as e-books and will soon account for $3 billion of the $25 billion market. Industry analysts expect this percentage to rise dramatically in the next few years. As an author, remember this number includes ALL books published including textbooks. I am still looking for numbers reporting the percentages in different areas of publishing like fiction.
A hybrid between traditional and self-publishing is arising. Typically, the publisher and the author share costs and profits. Details are scarce so far.
That's my take with the information I have gathered so far. The biggest draw to traditional publishing by far is the ego gratification of being a real published author, not just some nut with a manifesto. The stigma of self-publishing is fading, but we all dread the comment "oh, so you're not really published." Remember--the work is what should be taken seriously, not your ego. 

Summary:
Self-publishing Pros:
1.       More profits
2.       More control
3.       No agent
4.       Revise/update anytime
5.       Many international distribution outlets available (Amazon, etc.)
6.       Quicker turn-around
7.       Able to get technical points (ISBN numbers, bar codes) yourself
8.       Able to get reviews yourself
9.       Distribution networks traditionally controlled by big publishers are now available
10.   You retain the rights to your work and any form of publication and distribution
Self-Publishing Cons:
1.       You must do all the work yourself or hire someone
2.       You must finance the pre-production and printing
3.       Challenge finding good freelancers.
4.       Being the author AND the publisher
5.       Sales can be difficult without a strong platform (can be helped by strong marketing)
6.       Can be difficult to distribute to brick-and-mortar retailers (getting easier as the networks are opening to self- and small publishers)
Traditional Publishing Pros:
1.       Lends prestige and credibility
2.       Access to all distribution networks (including national bookstore chains)
3.       A sales force to represent your book
4.       Some support with publicity and promotion
5.       Publisher assumes pre-production and printing costs
6.       Possible advances on royalties
Traditional Publishing Cons:
1.       Must have an agent to represent you (paying agent 10-15% off your take)
2.       Lower profit on sales
3.       Must wait 18-24 months to publish (start to see reward)
4.       Publisher has final say on all creative decisions once the contract is signed.  New authors (less than 10 books successfully published) will not be able to change the usual contract language to counter this.
5.       Your retain the copyright, but the publisher owns all distribution rights for any format unless otherwise negotiated. New authors (less than 10 books successfully published) will not be able to change the usual contract language to counter this.
6.        You will still be required to provide substantial assistance for marketing and promotion.
7.       If your first book does not sell well, there is little hope they will publish a second.

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

A Moment with Ken Atchity—Part I

Now that the time-intensive holidays are over, I can get back to the rest of my life. It was great to see family (and bake far too many cookies), but the end of the year is approaching which means reviewing the past year and seeing where I want to go next. Which brings me back to the writing conference…
Ken Atchity gave us almost an opposite opinion of the publishing scene from Michael Neff, who ran the conference. Several of us wondered if Michael had known what Ken was going to say. Ken proffered that the publishers are as confused as the rest of us about the future of the industry.
Four years ago, Ken reports the number of books published per year as 52,000. Last year 750,000 books were published. Michael argued that including the self-published and ebooks skewed the numbers (especially since most of them are bad, in his opinion). Ken agreed that 80% are not the best quality, but gems can be found if you work through them. Where Michael dismissed the idea of self-publishing, Ken embraced it.
According to Ken, the rise in the risk of publishing (that the book won’t make money) has provoked a defensive response from the publishers. They now expect the author to take on a greater portion of the risk in the form of reduced advances and increased marketing requirements. If you don’t have a very commercial manuscript, you need to self-publish. However, self-publishing has its own pitfalls. For example- if you publish on Xlibris, Hollywood won’t touch it.
To many writers, being acceptable by Hollywood doesn’t seem to be all that important. Some writers even recoil in distaste at the idea of turning their “baby” into that commercial venture. Ken Atchity’s experience with Hollywood was his platform for his lecture. He explained that Hollywood is not interested in simply a good story. What they want is a total package. They want the project that has underlying property. Can your book be turned into a screenplay? And a series? And a graphic novel? And action figure merchandising? A recent example is the Stephanie Meyers vampire craze.
Ken has put together a company to lead writers through the development process to avoid the many pitfalls. His websites/contact information and other resources her provided:
www.storymerchant.com email: DrK@storymerchant.com

Next time: A Different Perspective on Being a Writer

Friday, November 19, 2010

New Adventures, New Friends

Part of the reason I started this blog was to have a place to tell my story as I write and publish my work. I want to share what I learn along the way. Please ask any questions. Many of you who look at this will know me as a chiropractor, among other things. Ask anything. The answers are up to me.
I attended the Algonkian Write and Pitch Writers’ Conference in Corte Madera, California, last week. As my first foray into the world of publishing seminars, it was a blast! Anticipation was high and I slept with one eye open for a week. I learned a bunch, had some things confirmed, and had my work slammed hard (even though they lost the writing samples they were supposed to evaluate). Michael Neff was in charge and assisted by Ann Wertz Garvin. He is a gifted man who seemed overwhelmed at times by this conference, the first of its kind. She was very funny and provided many insights as she has just published her first novel.
The conference was rescheduled once, by over three months, and the agent list changed dramatically. None of the agents I was interested when I signed up for it originally were in attendance. It was disappointing for those of us who had genre novels that could not tell from the description of the agents who to pitch to. I pitched to two before hearing about the one who was interested in fantasy work. The first one I pitched to didn’t handle my type of work, so I wasted her time. By the time I finished those two, I had to leave to go pack. I was fortunate enough that the second agent graciously asked me to send her a packet.
Over the next few days, I will detail some of the things I learned and resources we were given. The best things about the conference were the people I met. There were so many that I can’t remember all their names, but every one of them helped make it a great experience. Congratulations to everyone who got up before the mob and pitched your project. Each one taught me something and I applaude your tenacity adn guts. I love my Fairy Godmother from Canada and her engaging husband, Alan. And, of course, my new BFF Tiffany from Chicago. Thanks for keeping me laughing and listening.
Thanks for following!

Thursday, November 18, 2010

Welcome to My Blog!

Hello! Surprised? Me, too. I have had so many people ask my about my journey in writing that I decided to blog it. I attended my first writing conference last weeekend in Corte Madera, California. To say I learned a lot is an understatement. The fact that I still want to write and get published is a miracle. Over the next few days (or weeks) I will post about the things I learned.

The other exciting event right now is NaNoWriMo - National Novel Writing Month. I am woefully behind with time taken out to prepare for and go to the writing conference. But I will perservere...

Thank you for reading!